Sea Breeze

Joined

• started 284 topics
• posted 3,613 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Sea Breeze

• 
  141

  My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

  wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

  that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  "You need to understand why redshift is happening, then you realize quickly the Universe wasn’t made fully formed"
  

  So, can you "quickly"explain why you believe that red-shift proves the universe wasn't created?

  "However as has been proven already, the composition of these systems will be completely different."
  
  Not proven according to this NASA article:

  A team of European researchers, led by Rachana Bhatawdekar of ESA (the European Space Agency), set out to study the first generation of stars in the early universe. Known as Population III stars, these stars were forged from the primordial material that emerged from the big bang. Population III stars must have been made solely out of hydrogen, helium and lithium, the only elements that existed before processes in the cores of these stars could create heavier elements, such as oxygen, nitrogen, carbon and iron.

  Bhatawdekar and her team probed the early universe from about 500 million to 1 billion years after the big bang by studying the cluster MACS J0416 and its parallel field with the Hubble Space Telescope (with supporting data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope and the ground-based Very Large Telescope of the European Southern Observatory). "We found no evidence of these first-generation Population III stars in this cosmic time interval," said Bhatawdekar of the new results.
  
  "These results have profound astrophysical consequences as they show that galaxies must have formed much earlier than we thought," said Bhatawdekar.
  
  (Or maybe from the beginning)

  The Big Bang theory requires that stars, quasars and galaxies in the early universe be “primitive”, meaning metal-free. Because it requires many generations of supernovae to build up metal content in stars. That takes time.... a lot of it.

  This is one of the main things the WST is designed to look for - stars with no metal content or Population III stars as they are called. These are supposed to be first generation stars made of mostly only helium and hydrogen. About two thirds of the elements on the periodic table were not present after the supposed Big Bang event, but are alleged to have formed after stars burn out, then supernova, then re-assimilate millions of years again later, and so on.
  
  I predict that Webb will find "ordinary" stars and galaxies just as Hubble did. Stay tuned.
  
  
  Even more interesting is the fact that we may now already have evidence that my prediction is true with findings out of Hawaii where ordinary galaxies were found in what the Big Bang expected to be the “dark age” of evolution of the universe due to a somewhat unique gravitational lens effect.
  
  Wow, imagine that.... ordinary galaxies in the dark age of the "evolution" of the universe.
  
  Here's a list of just the top 30 problems with the BB Theory
• 
  7

  I was scrolling on my Google news feed and this came up

  by nowwhat? in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/global/multiple-nations-issue-joint-statement-calling-for-an-end-to-the-persecution-of-jehovahs-witnesses/.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Here's some interesting stats on Christians for one year....
  
  

  1 in 9 Christians worldwide experience high levels of persecution

  There is a 14% rise in the number of Christians in the top 50 countries on the 2019 World Watch List (WWL) who experience high levels of persecution. (from the 2018 reporting period to 2019’s)

  4,136 Christians killed for faith-related reasons in the top 50 WWL countries.

  2,625 Christians detained without trial, arrested, sentenced and imprisoned in the top 50 WWL countries.

  1,266 churches or Christian buildings attacked in the top 50 WWL countries.

  In seven of the countries in the World Watch List’s top 10, the primary cause of persecution is Islamic oppression.

  11 countries scoring in the “extreme” level for their persecution of Christians. Five years ago, North Korea was the only one.

  18 Consecutive years North Korea has ranked No. 1 as the world’s most dangerous place for Christians.
  
  Persecution by the Numbers
• 
  18

  Article to discuss or argue over: Buddha, Abraham, Jesus and Muhammed: Larger-than-life historic figures or largely legends?

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've posted a link to an article that contains important food for thought.

  as we search for information to free our minds and hearts of cult-like thinking which entails being able to critically think, we need to ponder research that is available to help us to make important decisions.

  we need to allow ourselves to consider other possibilities, something that jw’s are discouraged from doing.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  The Nazareth Inscription is almost certainly authentic, and it is a rump version of an imperial rescript. It was also almost certainly issued by the Emperor Claudius and most likely in 41 AD when the Jews were in turmoil and right after he had given Judah and Samaria to King Herod Agrippa I. The text of the Nazareth Inscription fits both the vocabulary, style and structure of other known rescripts of Claudius.

  As was seen above, Agrippa I was a governmental official in the city of Tiberias in the Galilee when both John the Baptist and Jesus Christ were ministering in Israel. Agrippa’s uncle Herod Antipas certainly knew that Jesus was a Galilean from Nazareth, [Luke 23:5-7] and King Agrippa I also must have known this.

  The close connection between the name of Jesus and the city of Nazareth is important for determining the place where the Nazareth Edict was posted. A careful look at the New Testament reveals that the followers of Jesus were at first not called Christians but rather “Nazarenes.” The Apostle Paul when he appeared before the Roman Governor Felix was accused by his Jewish enemies of being: “…a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes.” [Acts 24:5 NASV]

  It is also very clear in the New Testament that Jesus during his ministry was primarily called “Jesus of Nazareth.” There are many references in the New Testament to “Jesus of Nazareth” or “Jesus the Nazarene.” These references are made by both His followers and His enemies. Everyone who had heard of Jesus knew that he was from Nazareth. The titulus, which Pilate placed over the head of Jesus on the cross, read “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.” [John 19:19] When Peter appeared before the High Priest and the Sanhedrin in Acts 4:10, he spoke of: “Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead.”

  Unquestionably, King Herod Agrippa I, who was related to the family of the high priests, would have known that Jesus was from the city of Nazareth in Galilee, and that his Disciples were claiming that he had been resurrected. That King Agrippa I was well acquainted with Christianity can also be seen in his behavior after Claudius added Judea to his kingdom in 41 AD. As soon as he returned from Rome in 41 AD to claim Judea, one of the first things that King Agrippa I did was to persecute Christians in the city of Jerusalem, his new capital.

  It is nearly certain that it was King Herod Agrippa I who wrote the letter of inquiry to the Emperor Claudius about how to deal with the new “sect” of Jesus the Nazarene. It is also nearly certain that it was in response to Agrippa’s letter of inquiry that Claudius wrote an imperial rescript forbidding the removal of bodies from tombs in order to counter the Christian doctrine that Jesus had been resurrected from the dead.

  It is also nearly certain that it was King Herod Agrippa I who, through his influence on Claudius, had the Nazareth Inscription posted in Nazareth, the home city of the “sect of the Nazarenes.” As was noted above, King Herod Agrippa I may have even used the Nazareth Inscription as imperial authorization for the persecution of Christians and the execution of James the brother of John, see Acts.12:1-3.

  The best date for the posting of the Nazareth Inscription is 41 AD. In 41 AD Claudius became emperor and immediately had to deal with a developing revolt among the Jews, both those who were living in Israel and also those living in the city of Alexandria. As was related above, just before his assassination, Caligula had driven the Jews to the brink of revolt by ordering Roman officials to set up his image in the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. To deal with this explosive situation in 41 AD, Claudius almost certainly turned to his friend Agrippa I for advice and information.

  Since Agrippa I is known to have hated Nazarene Christians and since he also knew, as the Book of Acts records, that Christians were causing an uproar in Jerusalem at the very time when he became king of Judea in 41 AD, it seems nearly certain that it was at this same time that Agrippa I wrote his letter of inquiry to Claudius, and Claudius consequently wrote his rescript letter threatening Christians with death for the removal of bodies from tombs. With Agrippa I’s intimate knowledge of Christ and Christianity, it was almost certainly he who selected Nazareth as the site for the posting of the Nazareth Inscription.

  The question that now needs to be answered is: Does the Nazareth Inscription prove the resurrection of Christ. The answer to that question is no. But what it does prove is that the story of the resurrection of Christ was already well known very early, even to the Emperor Claudius in ca. 41 A.D. This fact clearly proves that the story of the resurrection of Christ was widely known almost immediately after His crucifixion. In other words, the story of the resurrection of Christ must have been a story that was circulated by his Apostles themselves, and it was not a later invention by gentile Christians of the post-apostolic period, as a few modern scholars in the past have argued.

  The Nazareth Inscription does force modern scholars into making a choice of either believing in the resurrection of Christ or of believing that His disciples stole His body from His tomb in order to perpetrate a great religious fraud. As is true for philosophy, science, and religion; belief is always the key issue.

  View Dr. Billington's entire article via PDF here: The Nazareth Inscription
• 
  18

  Article to discuss or argue over: Buddha, Abraham, Jesus and Muhammed: Larger-than-life historic figures or largely legends?

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've posted a link to an article that contains important food for thought.

  as we search for information to free our minds and hearts of cult-like thinking which entails being able to critically think, we need to ponder research that is available to help us to make important decisions.

  we need to allow ourselves to consider other possibilities, something that jw’s are discouraged from doing.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  No takers in trying to explain away the minimum facts surrounding the resurrection?
  
  C'mon Barbara, this is your thread. Care to take a stab at it?

  The Resurrection is the most documented event in the ancient world. It changed the world more than any other event. The entire world counts time from the birth of this man. Without the Resurrection, there is no reason why all (but one) of his disciples (as eyewitnesses, not just believers) chose to suffer a brutal death rather than deny Jesus. No one dies for a lie. There is no other explanation for the growth of the Christian church.

  I believe that even Caesar confirmed the Resurrection. Tomb robbers take valuables from tombs... not stinking rotten bodies, or bones. But Ceasar issued an unusual type of edit (The Nazareth Inscription) reserved for special problems to make it illegal to steal bodies from tombs shortly after the Resurrection. Wow!

  He affirmed the most important event in history. He just didn’t mean to do it - Article
  
  
  
• 
  18

  Article to discuss or argue over: Buddha, Abraham, Jesus and Muhammed: Larger-than-life historic figures or largely legends?

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've posted a link to an article that contains important food for thought.

  as we search for information to free our minds and hearts of cult-like thinking which entails being able to critically think, we need to ponder research that is available to help us to make important decisions.

  we need to allow ourselves to consider other possibilities, something that jw’s are discouraged from doing.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  "I will find a way around your system so as I may use the New Testament to prove the resurrection of Christ."
  
  TBK, I don't recall this quote. Do you have a time stamp for it?
  
  Scholars, both skeptic and believer use the bible all the time, they just use it critically in scholarly circles. They usually don't outright reject it or believe it, but use it critically according to historical criteria and apparatus. The bottom line is that Dr. Habermas claims 90 -95% of all scholars (who publish in this area) believe 6 of the below points and about 75% believe the other 6 points. So these 12 points make up the minimum facts that most scholars (skeptic, atheist, agnostic and otherwise) believe about the Resurrection.
  
  

  1. Jesus died by Roman crucifixion.
  2. He was buried, most likely in a private tomb.
  3. Soon afterward, the disciples were discouraged, bereaved, and despondent, having lost hope.
  4. Jesus’ tomb was found empty very soon after his interment.
  5. The disciples had experiences that they believed were actual appearances of the risen Jesus.
  6. Due to these experiences, the disciples’ lives were thoroughly transformed, even being willing to die for this belief.
  7. The proclamation of the resurrection took place very early, at the beginning of church history.
  8. The disciples’ public testimony and preaching of the resurrection took place in the city of Jerusalem, where Jesus had been crucified and buried shortly before.
  9. The Gospel message centered on the death and resurrection of Jesus.
  10. Sunday was the primary day for gathering and worshipping.
  11. James, the brother of Jesus and former skeptic, was converted when, he believed, he saw the risen Jesus.
  12. Just a few years later, Saul of Tarsus (Paul) became a Christian believer due to an experience that he believed was an appearance of the risen Jesus.”
      
      It is very difficult to come up with alternative plausible explanations for these minimal facts. Take for instance just one: # 10
      
      What would it take for tens of thousands of orthodox Jews to stop making Saturday their Holy Day, and change it to Sunday? Keep in mind that they would be shunned by family and friends every bit as harshly as we have been at the behest of the WT.
      
      Orthodox Jews don't change, history has taught us that. Only they did - right in the heart of Jerusalem!
      
      A real resurrection is a plausible explanation for this fact that skeptic scholars agree on. The other 11 are hard to explain away as well. Got ahead, try.... its no so easy.
      
      As for the other people on Barbara's list..... well they are all dead. Why would I want to listen to or follow a dead guy? But a guy who is still alive after being put to death, well that's someone worth listening to. Not as easy to dismiss.
• 
  15

  Another example of how Watchtower are rewriting their own history.

  by skin in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  from today's daily wt text.. friday, december 31 2021.let your kingdom come.

  let your will take place, as in heaven, also on earth.​—matt.

  6:10. christendom generally does not teach the scriptural truth that one day obedient humans will live forever on earth.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  

  That WT article is very misleading. Christians have always believed in the paradise earth..... they just didn't call it that. They call it the Millennium Reign. This one hundred year old chart from a Baptist pastor illustrates.
  
  After Augustine, the Roman Church allegorized the Millennium reign. But aside from that, Christ's Millennium Reign on earth for 1000 years has been bedrock Christian doctrine since the beginning.
• 
  141

  My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

  wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

  that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  "Given the fact that the mechanism of "seeing" into the past is via the extreme red shift of the most distant galaxies, I'd say that's [seeing early fully formed stars and spiral galaxies] probably a pretty safe bet."

  What you are calling a "safe bet" is my prediction from a Creation perspective. This is not what the big bang scientists at NASA are expecting.
  
  That's why they have been "surprised" and will continue to be surprised by early fully formed mature looking galaxies.
  
  "This means all telescopes view objects not as they are, but as they once were — in some cases millions or even billions of years ago. Because of Webb's sensitivity, it will be able to see all the way back to a time when the first galaxies were forming after the Big Bang, which took place about 13.8 billion years ago." - Article
  
  This NASA website says this:
  
  "Webb will be able to see back to about 100 million - 250 million years after the Big Bang. "
  
  There is nothing poetic about it. If you think NASA is wrong, then you should let them know. If these images of the early universe come back with fully formed mature looking galaxies.... and scientists are again 'surprised" at how fast galaxies supposedly formed.... as I predict they will be; then this fits a Creation Model, not a Big Bang Model.
  
  You are attempting to hijack my prediction, and say that observing fully formed spiral galaxies close to the time of the BB is a safe bet. It is a safe bet only from a literal biblical creation model.
  
  The BB model presupposes stars slowly getting together over billions of years and assembling themselves into beautiful spiral galaxies.
  
  
  
• 
  141

  My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

  wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

  that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  TD,
  
  With all due respect. You haven't explained anything. Here is a NASA image that explains big bang predictions:

  

  Notice how the big bang predicts stars and galaxies being formed long after the "big bang". This NASA website says this:
  
  Webb will be able to see back to about 100 million - 250 million years after the Big Bang. But why do we need to see infrared light to understand the early universe? Because light from these objects is shifted to the red.

  NASA expects to "see" the universe as it was 100 million years ago or so with this new telescope. This is a fact. You cannot change this fact. Your references to red-shift cannot change this fact. I have proved this with numerous references from NASA to show this. But, you are not receiving it.
  
  If you think what NASA is trying to do is impossible because of red-shift, you should call them right away and explain it to them so they can stop misleading the public about being able to see an early universe.

  Notice this Q & A from NASA Official: Phil Newman

  Question:

  When did the first stars form in the universe?

  Answer:

  "Results from NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) released in February 2003 show that the first stars formed when the universe was only about 200 million years old. Observations by WMAP also revealed that the universe is currently about 13. 7 billion years old. So it was very early in the time after the Big Bang explosion that stars formed....This result surprised many scientists who thought that it would have taken much longer for gravity to pull enough matter together to make a star."
  

  
  
• 
  18

  Article to discuss or argue over: Buddha, Abraham, Jesus and Muhammed: Larger-than-life historic figures or largely legends?

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've posted a link to an article that contains important food for thought.

  as we search for information to free our minds and hearts of cult-like thinking which entails being able to critically think, we need to ponder research that is available to help us to make important decisions.

  we need to allow ourselves to consider other possibilities, something that jw’s are discouraged from doing.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  PP:
  
  I think your misunderstood me. I didn't say he was an atheist. Bart Ehrman is characterized as being "agnostic leaning toward atheist" by Dr. Habermas on the video I linked to above. So, that is how I characterized him.

  As a side note: the world's most famous atheist characterizes himself as an agnostic when pressed - Richard Dawkins.
  
  Richard Dawkins publicly argued for the position of militant atheism and claimed that he will not feel anything after death (see also: Ex-atheists).[6][7][8] Despite arguing for the position of militant atheism previously, Dawkins told the Archbishop Dr. Rowan Williams that he never said was an atheist.[9][10][11] See also: Atheism and historical revisionism
• 
  18

  Article to discuss or argue over: Buddha, Abraham, Jesus and Muhammed: Larger-than-life historic figures or largely legends?

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've posted a link to an article that contains important food for thought.

  as we search for information to free our minds and hearts of cult-like thinking which entails being able to critically think, we need to ponder research that is available to help us to make important decisions.

  we need to allow ourselves to consider other possibilities, something that jw’s are discouraged from doing.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Hi Barbara,
  

  
  This author recently wrote an article titled "5 historical truths that suggest Jesus never existed". She's a psychologist.
  
  It looks like this author is just another radical anti-theist who has jumped onto the band-wagon of Mysticism. Bart Ehrmann, who is currently the world's top atheist-leaning bible critic, says that such a view makes proponents of these kinds of myths (the myth that denies Jesus' existence) " look foolish to the outside world."
  
  He cautions his atheist friends to not go down this road:
  
  https://www.str.org/w/bart-ehrman-on-the-existence-of-jesus
  
  
  
  On the other hand, modern scholarship on Jesus and the Resurrection, has been moving in the opposite direction in the past 35 years as Dr. Habermas explains here at the University of California Santa Barbara:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOW7k3hQ-vE&ab_channel=FallenEmbers